Technology in the Classroom

Technology is a double-edged sword in the classroom, as it can be used positively to contribute to student engagement, but also negatively as a source of distraction, specifically in the form of media. As in the case of a distraction, the possibilities are endless as the entirety of the internet is in the students' palms. There has to be a delicate balance of technology usage in the classroom, and I align more with the controlled usage of technology and the prohibited use of media in the class. In my high school days (Class of 2022), I personally saw my classmates use wireless AirPods, concealing them with long hair.

One concern I hear from parents is that they want to be able to contact their children in the event of an emergency. I do understand their concern, and I suppose a compromise is for the students to ask professionally to check their devices. I mean this by a quick glance, or in the event of a phone call from Mom, allow them to step out and answer that call. If they do step out, I want to create a form that they check in and out of for accountability in content missed in class.

On the positive side of technology, I have seen great implementation in classrooms with its easy accessibility. Students can quickly gather sources to support their assignments, or, in one personal example, use media as an example of bad sources.

I definitely have to address my stance on technology. It has taken a wild swing towards the bad direction with the ease and comfort of usage in classrooms or otherwise professional settings. When I am at the gym, sometimes I fall into the hole of social media and forget to continue working out. I do not think social media has a place in classrooms, but I do think technology belongs in classrooms. Finding that balance is ultimately the harder problem for educators and school administrators.

Comments

Poetry Results VS Results of Poetry

Writing poetry and Writing about poetry are two different things at opposite ends of the scale because they have different objectives. You can say that they are the same, but in doing so, your attention is only drawn to one: You cannot write a poem but also write about it. The mystery behind poetry contributes to its poetic quality, as it leaves the reader uncertain about what will happen next or what the author means by a particular line. For example, if you are using Chat GPT to write a paper, you know every word that is going to belong next, whereas going off the fly, you are bound to make mistakes. I say this because writing about poetry requires an analytical lens that follows poetic styles and explores emotional depth or symbolic images that emerge as a result of the poem. Your objective in writing about poetry is to analyze it and interpret the poem. The poem you are analyzing is likely not your own and, therefore, subject to an entirely different thought process, or, like some ...

Writing VS Studying a Myth

A myth is a traditional story that typically tells the journey of a god or a hero and they fight cultural beliefs, or against a moral issue. The difference between writing and studying a myth is much different than any other work I've had to write. Starting off with writing . Writing the myth was so hard. I struggled with the writing style because it is so much different than what I am used to. As controversial as it sounds, I like writing essays. I like writing argumentative text, and I do not mind writing formal texts, such as using scholarly sources. Adapting my argumentative style to a more relaxed, storytelling approach was something I was not ready for. It was different. There were so many moments when I went on useless tangents, delaying the story to insert background information. Then there were also moments where I needed to dig into my creative prowess, but this ship crashed and burned a good number of times… About reading myths . Reading myths was much easier. T...

VLOG but reading

Search This Blog