A myth is a traditional story that typically tells the journey of a god or a hero and they fight cultural beliefs, or against a moral issue. The difference between writing and studying a myth is much different than any other work I've had to write. Starting off with writing . Writing the myth was so hard. I struggled with the writing style because it is so much different than what I am used to. As controversial as it sounds, I like writing essays. I like writing argumentative text, and I do not mind writing formal texts, such as using scholarly sources. Adapting my argumentative style to a more relaxed, storytelling approach was something I was not ready for. It was different. There were so many moments when I went on useless tangents, delaying the story to insert background information. Then there were also moments where I needed to dig into my creative prowess, but this ship crashed and burned a good number of times… About reading myths . Reading myths was much easier. T...
Writing poetry and Writing about poetry are two different things at opposite ends of the scale because they have different objectives. You can say that they are the same, but in doing so, your attention is only drawn to one: You cannot write a poem but also write about it. The mystery behind poetry contributes to its poetic quality, as it leaves the reader uncertain about what will happen next or what the author means by a particular line. For example, if you are using Chat GPT to write a paper, you know every word that is going to belong next, whereas going off the fly, you are bound to make mistakes. I say this because writing about poetry requires an analytical lens that follows poetic styles and explores emotional depth or symbolic images that emerge as a result of the poem. Your objective in writing about poetry is to analyze it and interpret the poem. The poem you are analyzing is likely not your own and, therefore, subject to an entirely different thought process, or, like some ...